It’s time for an “education president.” As the only former public school superintendent running, he believes that “there’s no public good that’s more important than education.” Although his local record included school closures, merit pay, and approving space for charter schools in district buildings, the Senator supports the federal government as a “useful partner” in K-12, rejects private school vouchers, and has stated that public dollars should be reserved for pay[ing] teachers what they’re worth.”
Will reverse course so students don’t pay for fiscal irresponsibility. Congress passed a $1 trillion permanent corporate tax cut that the Senator admits “doesn’t reflect a priority of the next generation.” If elected president, he would “repeal … parts of the … tax cut … and combat tax evasion.” These fixes would pay for universal pre-K, free community college, and increases in educator salaries.
Supports the resurgence of unions. The Senator supports protecting and strengthening workers’ right to bargain collectively. He believes in “reversing the decades-long decline in union membership.” If elected president, he plans to “push back against right to work laws… [and] make union dues deductible.”
Supports targeted funds for class size. The Senator from Colorado believes in providing resources to reduce class size, but supports efforts that ensure funds are available where they are needed most. He is a cosponsor of the Smaller Class Sizes for Students and Educators Act. Legislation that “prioritizes funding for high-poverty school districts to reduce class size.”
“Yes, but…” on universal pre-K. When he was asked, “Should the federal government fund and implement a national, free universal pre-K program,” he responded “Yes,” but “free for low-income families.” However, according to the Senator, if the federal government provides $1 for every $3 from state and local governments, the country could ensure “free preschool nationwide for all 4-year-olds by 2024 and for all 3-year-olds by 2027.” He believes, “If we want equal to mean equal in this country, every child in America must have access to high-quality, free preschool.”
Supports free tuition at all institutions. The Senator has a plan to make community college free immediately through expanded “Pell grants and other financial aid.” Gradually, he would eliminate tuition and debt from four-year institutions. In exchange, his administration would monitor colleges’ “default rates or debt-to-income ratios that are excessive—and … may … [deny] … Pell grants, student loans, and other federal support.” He believes, frankly, “college costs too much.”
Cosponsor of the Paycheck Fairness Act. The Senator finds existing wage differences between men and women “unconscionable.” In supporting legislation like the Paycheck Fairness Act, he believes “everyone, regardless of gender, deserves equal pay for equal work.”
Obamacare is the foundation for expanded access to healthcare. The senator believes that “it is a disgrace that we remain the only industrialized country in the world that doesn’t provide universal coverage.” He proposes that under a Bennet administration, he would offer a new program called “Medicare-X, a public option plan that builds on the Affordable Care Act.” Bennet assures that “individuals will not pay any more than 13 percent of their income on insurance premiums,” and he would request an “authorization of $30 billion over three years for a national reinsurance program to stabilize the marketplace.”
Supports tax incentives that improve Americans quality of life. Bennet supports broad tax policies that address climate change, healthcare, and the needs of working families. He proposes “an investment tax credit for… energy storage technology,” a fully refundable child tax credit that would be paid out monthly, and a caregivers tax credit “of up to $3,000.”
Opposes for-profit charter schools. When asked on a questionnaire about his positions on charter schools, the senator affirmed that he “supports banning for-profits and increasing accountability.”
Supports professional pay for educators. As the former Superintendent of Denver Public Schools, the Senator has a past that includes implementing a “pay-for-performance plan” and unsuccessfully attempting to “require districts to show salary equity across schools before tapping federal funding.” However, the Senator now rails against “Trump’s tax cuts, arguing that the administration could have instead paid for universal pre-K, [and] raised the salary of every teacher in America by 50 percent.” He supports the federal government subsidizing teacher pay, and believes in setting a goal “that every educator in America is compensated with at least the equivalent amount they could earn in the private sector with a comparable level of education.”
Opposes vouchers. When asked on a candidate questionnaire, “Do you support using public money in the form of vouchers or tax credits for private or religious school education,” the candidate responded, “no.”
Proposes a collection of 21st century updates for schools. The Senator’s education plan includes expanding support for “high-quality early interventions” like home visits, nutrition programs, and family engagement activities. He also supports encouraging greater educator diversity and extending the school day and year. Other student supports his administration would advance include “expanding mental health … resources … [and] promoting … restorative practices.”
No Child Left Behind was a mistake. Regrets supporting this legislation and favored an alternative that supported his vision: “You need better teachers. You need smaller classrooms. You need to start kids earlier.”
Invest in free college for all. The former vice president believes in prioritizing tuition-free college and warns that “any country that out-educates us will out-compete us.” Concerning how to fund free college, he assures that “we can afford it.”
He’s with workers. He supports “laws that allow labor unions to flourish and fight for basic worker protections.” The former vice president also believes in banning non-compete agreements and protecting workers in pay discussions.
Knows that smaller classes work. As a U.S. senator, the former vice president introduced legislation to reduce class size. He believes that small classes should be “one pillar of our education system,” and quotes research that shows small classes “particularly in the early grades, improves student performance.” He understands that “when a teacher is responsible for … 25, 30, or more students, how can we expect each student to receive enough time and attention?”
Universal pre-kindergarten is a long-term investment. In outlining his plans for a Biden administration, the former vice president has committed to providing “high-quality, universal pre-kindergarten for all 3- and 4-year olds.” He believes that “this investment will ease the burden on our families, help close the achievement gap, promote the labor participation of parents who want to work, and lift our critical early childhood education workforce out of poverty.”
Would erase educators’ loans. Biden sees no reason for educators “to worry about how they are going to make their student loan payments while they are busy educating the next generation.” He proposes expanding access to the federal Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, with special provisions for educators.
It’s been time. Biden laments, “In 2019, it’s past time we close the pay gap and ensure women get paid as much as men.” While serving in the Obama administration, he was involved with passage of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and advocated for the Paycheck Fairness Act, legislation designed to help women who have faced wage discrimination. He also recognizes the “cumulative discrimination black women face due to both their gender and color of their skin” in even wider pay gaps. He believes, “This is a chance to get on the right side of history.”
Obamacare is a good start. The former vice president does not support healthcare plans that “start from scratch and get rid of private insurance.” His plan for expanding even more access to healthcare would include providing a public option, premium tax credits for working families, and lowering the cost of prescription drugs. He explains that “every American has a right to the peace of mind that comes with knowing they have access to affordable, quality healthcare.”
Believes Trump tax cuts exacerbate inequality. The former vice president sees “economic inequality … pulling this country apart,” and vows to end special-interest tax breaks and multimillionaire loopholes. Features of his tax plan includs “repealing Trump … tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy… expanding the childcare credit to $8,000 … [and] enhancing tax breaks for low- and middle-income workers who are saving for retirement.”
Opposes federal funding of charter schools. Biden supports public schools and does not agree with “any federal funding going to for-profit charter schools.” For existing charters, he believes that potential students should not be subjected to admissions tests. When approached about his position on charter schools, he reiterated his support for banning for-profits and increasing accountability.
Supports raises, dignity for educators. The former vice president proposes “tripling federal funding for Title I” to help school districts “offer educators competitive salaries.” If elected president, he “will support our educators by giving them the pay and dignity they deserve.”
Opposes vouchers. Biden finds that “the same people pushing vouchers for schools … oppose[d] subsidizing after school programs … [but were] for subsidizing oil companies.”
Knows how to beat the NRA. Biden believes that to reduce gun violence, the federal government should close gun-show loopholes and “ban the sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.” If elected president, he pledges that “I will defeat the NRA again … I’ve done it before—twice.” He previously led Congress to pass background checks “and bans on assault weapons.”
Schools need a leader who understands them. If elected president, he has pledged “to appoint a teacher as education secretary.” To support students and ensure their success, Biden proposes doubling the number of health professionals in schools, supporting more community schools, and providing infrastructure resources “to build cutting-edge, energy-efficient, innovative schools with technology and labs to prepare our students for the jobs of the future.”
Will not disassociate from private school vouchers. In expressing concern that poor children and children of color need an escape from struggling schools, the senator stands by his support of vouchers. He declared that his views “haven’t changed one iota.”
Supports investing in high-quality education. The senator introduced the “Supporting the Teaching Profession through Revitalizing Investments in Valuable Educators (STRIVE) Act,” which boosts resources for teacher recruitment, preparation programs, and diversity initiatives. He also supports full funding of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA).
Believes unions should be heard. The senator is an original cosponsor of the 2018 Worker’s Freedom to Negotiate Act, which facilitates first contracts between companies and newly certified unions by requiring mediation and arbitration to settle disputes.
Supports smaller classes but with local input. The senator cosponsored the Smaller Class Sizes for Students and Educators Act, which provides funding “for high-poverty school districts to reduce class size.” In allocating resources, the senator believes that “local leaders should make decisions about what works best for them … I believe we shouldn’t have one-size-fits-all education.”
The answer is YES. When asked, “Should the federal government fund and implement a national, free universal pre-K program,” the senator responded “yes,” and it should be “free for everyone.”
Supports free tuition at public institutions. The senator led efforts to reintroduce the Debt-Free College Act, which provides matching grants for states to offset tuition and related expenses for students. According to the senator, “higher education is one of the surest paths to economic security and prosperity for Americans, but the astronomical price tag means that ladder of opportunity remains elusive for many students … and low-income students are hurt the most.”
He’s a proud feminist. The senator cosponsored the Paycheck Fairness Act, and enthusiastically admits “to being an unabashed feminist.” He believes that “we all need to be working against gaps in pay for doing the same work.” Despite Congress’ refusal to take up legislation on fair pay, he joined a group of Congressional colleagues in requesting that “the Government Accountability Office … study pay differences between men and women in the federal government.”
Supports Medicare for all. The senator believes this “single-payer system would save the American people money by reducing rising healthcare spending and significantly lowering administrative costs.” He also cites expanding access to healthcare as contributing to improving schools. “In communities like mine, low-income communities, this is an education issue because kids who do not have healthcare are not going to succeed in school.” He finds that “the current debate over Medicare for All really has nothing to do with healthcare. It’s all about greed and profiteering.”
His tax plan supports urban communities. The senator proposes a plan that includes “a refundable credit for renters” and expansion of the earned income tax credit. To support urban revitalization, he also recommends tightening elements of the Opportunity Zone Program. Booker proposes a carbon tax to raise additional revenue “to reduce income inequality.”
It’s complicated. The senator has been “billed as a leader in the school choice movement,” and he has not shied away from promoting charter schools or vouchers. However, as a presidential candidate, he now says that “I’m a guy who believes in public education and, in fact, I look at some of the charter laws … and I find them really offensive.” Despite past comments in which he envisioned Newark as “the charter capital of the nation,” he now supports banning for-profits and increasing accountability over charter schools.
Supports subsidizing pay for educators. When he was mayor of Newark, the senator worked closely with education reform advocates to implement “pay for performance.” As a presidential candidate, he now supports providing educators with additional compensation through federal subsidies. He believes that “we must pay teachers more … and invest in our schools.”
Now he opposes vouchers. As a presidential candidate, when asked “Do you support using public money in the form of vouchers or tax credits for private or religious school education?” the senator responded “no.” The response reflects a shift for the senator, who previously expressed his support for vouchers as a means for “children of color … to escape from struggling public schools.”
Time to track and restrict gun purchases. Booker has a comprehensive plan for reducing gun violence. He proposes creating “a national gun licensing program, banning assault weapons, [and] high-capacity magazines.” For gun manufacturers, he would “allow them to be found liable in civil suits.”
The candidate has not provided proposals or comments about policies to support 21st century schools.
Educators know what they’re doing. The mayor believes that educators need the freedom to do their jobs without the weight of standardized tests. He also values “strong working relationship[s] with teachers,” and compensating them well. The mayor suggests “respect them like soldiers … pay them like doctors.”
Not sold on taxpayers footing the bill for free college. While not unfamiliar with student loan debt and the rising costs of college, the mayor is concerned about public financing of college. He grapples with the idea that “a majority who earn less because they didn’t go to college subsidize a minority who earn more because they did.”
Supports working more closely with labor. The mayor acknowledges the energy of the labor movement, and in meeting with them suggests that “Workers … are interested in the same things any American is interested in,” and that staying “in dialogue and working together” is important.
Teacher shortages make an impact. The mayor has not specifically commented on reducing class size, but supports educators. He believes that “too many children are being denied educational justice. From inadequate resources and critical teacher shortages.” His plan for education, called “The Schools of the Future Plan,” would seek substantial additional resources for students at Title I schools.
Supports universal pre-K. The mayor applauded local efforts that provided additional resources to expand access to pre-K programs. He enthusiastically recognized this progress, in stating, “Looking forward to pre-K expansion funds to benefit kids in our area. Every step towards universal access is progress!”
Now he supports debt-free college. Previously the mayor admitted to having “a hard time … with the idea of a majority who earn less because they didn’t go to college subsidizing a minority who earn more because they did.” However, he has released a plan for “debt-free college” that supports “completely free” public tuition for lower-income families and “large increases in Pell Grants.”
Supports gender pay equity. As mayor he recognized and participated in events for Equal Pay Day. When Indiana was officially ranked 47th in the country for fair pay, he admitted that this distinction “is an embarrassment to our country.”
Wants the best of both worlds. Although he believes in universal healthcare, “The best way to do that is a Medicare for all who want it.” The mayor’s approach would “take some flavor of Medicare, [and] … make it available on the exchange as a public option.”
Tax cuts for the wealthy don’t work. The mayor was not in favor of President Trump’s $1.5 trillion-dollar tax cut “for the wealthy.” Instead, he favors “a wealth tax … eliminating … corporate tax breaks, and more equitable use of the estate tax.”
He’s for public education—period. His vision for the future of education does not include for-profit charters. He believes that “expansion of charter schools … is something that we need to really draw back on until we’ve corrected what needs to be corrected in terms of underfunded public education.” He also has stated firmly that voucher programs “come at the expense of quality public education.”
Supports a pay increase, respect for educators. The South Bend, Ind., mayor proposes “increasing funding for Title I schools … to boost teacher pay.” He believes “we must respect and value our teachers as the essential public servants that they are, and compensate them accordingly.”
Supports public education first. The mayor does not support private school vouchers. He believes in focusing and correcting “underfunded public education.” Vouchers, he suggests, “come at the expense of quality public education.”
Arming educators is an admission of defeat. Buttigieg opposes proposals that support arming educators. He believes that “it’d be such an enormous condemnation of our country if we were to become the only developed nation where this is necessary.” To reduce gun violence, he supports creating national gun licensing programs and banning assault weapons. The mayor believes eliminating access to these weapons should be a no-brainer, asking, “Since when are American cities and neighborhoods supposed to be war zones?”
Wants to support students facing educational injustice. The mayor is concerned about “inadequate resources … critical teacher shortages … [and] discriminatory disciplinary policies.” By substantially increasing funding for Title I schools, he believes that extra resources would be available to address these areas, and also invest “in high-quality … educational programs.”
Not having access to pre-K is an unnecessary missed opportunity. American children are behind in attending preschool, and some children “never catch up if they don’t get formal schooling until kindergarten.” The former HUD secretary and mayor believes that pre-K programs should be available for “every family in America,” and if he could expand access in San Antonio, he can expand access across the country.
Time for rededication. Holds state legislatures responsible “for failing to support public education adequately,” and finds “we’ve lost our commitment to public education that made us so strong in the first place.”
Puts the campaign where his policy is. As a supporter of collective bargaining and an increase in the minimum wage, Castro pays all of his campaign staff at least $15 per hour (including interns) and allows them to form a union.
Supports smaller class sizes. The former HUD secretary acknowledges the impact of smaller class sizes for students. In his plan for education, called “People First Education,” he commits that in his administration he would “cut down on class sizes to foster individualized learning.”
It’s personal. As mayor of San Antonio, he expanded access to pre-K programs and financed them with a sales tax. He said that “having more children in high-quality early childhood programs would benefit the city over the long term.” Although the program served less than 10 percent of area 4-year-olds in 2018, the program’s potential served as inspiration for his presidential education platform that now calls for a universal “Pre-K for USA” program.
All public institutions should be free. His plan for education calls for a variety of remedies to reduce the costs of college and student debt. Solutions include “ending tuition at all public colleges … increasing access to dual-enrollment programs … and excluding for-profit colleges from federal aid programs.”
It’s complicated. As mayor of San Antonio, his administration was found to have discriminated against three women by paying them less than their male colleagues, and then retaliating when the women complained. Before leaving the city to join the Obama administration as HUD secretary, he requested “an outside review of pay disparities in the city.”
Supports Medicare for all. The former HUD secretary does not “believe … anybody should go without healthcare or that the profit motive should ever keep somebody from getting the care they need.” Universal access to healthcare is possible “by raising taxes on corporations and on the wealthiest ‘0.05, 0.5 or 1 percent’ of Americans.” He also supports extending healthcare benefits to undocumented immigrants.
Supports taxing wealthy heirs. The candidate has proposed a new “inheritance wealth tax.” It would ensure that wealthy heirs pay their fair share of taxes on inherited wealth. He believes his proposal would also “prevent the concentration of economic and political power.” Data shows that his proposal would affect “less than 1 percent of the wealthiest heirs … yet it would raise over $250 billion in revenue over 10 years.”
Unclear where he stands on charter schools. Although he attended the ribbon cutting of a public charter expansion event, when given the opportunity to clarify his position on charter schools, the candidate did not respond.
Supports profession, increasing educator pay. The former HUD secretary proposes creating a new federal tax credit “that could boost teacher pay by $10,000 per year.” He believes in the importance of supporting educators so that “the next generation” views the profession as a viable career.
Opposes vouchers. When asked on a candidate questionnaire, “Do you support using public money in the form of vouchers or tax credits for private or religious school education?” the candidate responded, “No.”
Calls out hate-filled gun violence. The former HUD secretary supports banning assault weapons, instituting universal background checks, and restricting high capacity magazines. He also cites the rise in hate crimes as an urgent call to repair “our nation’s weak gun laws [that] enable violent extremism.”
Schools need resources to support students’ diverse needs. Embedded in his plans from education to policing, the former HUD secretary proposes $150 billion to support education technology, and he would ensure the availability of resources to treat lead poisoning. He also would restrict schools from using federal funds to support police officers as “discipline agents,” and he would require schools to participate in “unconscious bias training.”
There’s a new K -12. The former representative is pushing for pre-K through 14 as the nation’s standard, with 14 referring to two years of community college or technical training. He has pledged to “reinvest in educational opportunities for all,” including making higher education more affordable.
Money matters. Affirming that “education is the great equalizer,” he supports investments that close funding gaps exacerbated by property tax financing of schools. His plan for education calls for Title I increases and the expansion of grants for community-based organizations that help struggling students.
Respects labor but sides with management. Despite using a college scholarship from his father’s union, the former representative has introduced anti-worker legislation that allows management “greater power to reassign workers or rely on outside contractors.”
Supports individualized learning. According to his plan, “we must prioritize education.” In outlining his priorities, he proposes a “need to update our model to drive more innovation and focus on individualized learning.” He does not mention or make reference to smaller class sizes.
Has a plan to pay for universal pre-K. The former congressman is a longstanding supporter of expanding access to pre-K programs. For the country to provide universal pre-K, he proposes “placing a 1.5 percent surtax on Americans earning higher than $500,000.”
Supports removing the weight of student loans. As president, Delaney has pledged to “make higher education more affordable.” Key elements of this plan include decreasing the cost of student loans, increasing grant opportunities for lower-income families, and allowing “borrowers to discharge … student loan debt in bankruptcy proceedings.”
Supports efforts to close the wage gap. While serving in Congress, he co-sponsored the Paycheck Fairness Act, and he has affirmed that “equal pay for equal work is a core American value.”
Believes in universal healthcare. Although the former congressman supports expanding access to healthcare, he is concerned about proposals like Medicare for All. He believes “in everyone making their own decisions.” Under his plan, he affirms that everyone could be covered, “letting the government negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies and requiring wealthy Americans to cover part of the cost of their healthcare.”
Supports expanding tax credits for working families. For starters, the former congressman “would roll back tax breaks for wealthy Americans.” He also supports “doubling the earned income tax credit” and “a payroll tax increase to pay for a paid family leave program.” Before his election to the U.S. House of Representatives, he worked on Wall Street, and supports additional “tax credits to promote venture capital investments in minority-owned businesses.”
Supports charter schools. He has previously stated that “a one-size-fits-all approach to education is wrong.” The candidate believes that charter schools should be “part of the solution.”
Supports hiring more educators, but does not mention pay. The former congressman has stated that “we need more teachers.” By raising the capital gains tax, he believes this approach would help “expand the number of teachers.” He does not mention compensation for educators.
Has voted for private school vouchers. When the Republican-led Congress voted to reauthorize the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program, the congressman voted “yes.”
Ready to act on reducing gun violence. The former congressman supports red flag laws to empower families with the ability to protect themselves and the community from someone who poses a threat. He also supports instituting universal background checks, banning assault weapons, and funding “gun violence research.”
Believes it’s time for something new. The former congressman “believes pre-K through 14 … is the new K-12.” To support this structure, he proposes the creation of “a new Committee of 10.” The group would be assigned to “rethink our basic model of education … [and lead an] update [of] our model to drive more innovation and focus on individualized learning.”
Believes in creating more opportunities for students. She supports expanding students’ access to STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts , and math) programs. In addition, she supports the College for All act, which would eliminate tuition and fees at four-year public colleges and universities for families that make up to $125,000 a year. It would also make community college tuition-free for everyone.
Not afraid to fight. In Congress she has vowed to “protect funding for education programs.” She also was successful in securing the reauthorization of the Native Hawaiian Education Act, which supports innovative educational programs across the state of Hawaii.
Votes for working people. Primarily, her record supports workers. She has stood up for wage protections and endorsed an increase in the minimum wage. Her record veers in oversight of the Department of Veterans Affairs, where she has supported weakened standards for discharges and permitted the forfeiture of some employee pensions.
Has not mentioned class size. Although the congresswoman from Hawaii believes “we need to make sure we are investing in the future of all our children,” her commitment to providing “adequate resources” makes no reference to reducing class sizes.
No position on universal pre-K. Although her education plan calls for “ensure[ing] that all our students have equal access to quality education,” she does not reference access to pre-K programs. When asked where we she stands on free, universal pre-K programs, neither she nor her campaign responded.
The consequences of unequal pay are high. As a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives, she cosponsored the Paycheck Fairness Act, and has tried to urge her colleagues to understand that “wage discrimination doesn’t just hold back women, but all working families.”
Supports Medicare for all. She believes that private insurance has a role, but “supports Medicare for All to make sure that every American gets quality healthcare.” Her approach focuses “on reducing the cost of healthcare overall.” She supports more preventative healthcare options and reducing the cost of prescription drugs. The congresswoman believes in “ensuring transparency so people know exactly what the cost is and what they’re paying for.”
Supports taxes that support working families. The congresswoman supports a variety of “tax incentives” that favor “businesses that help workers pay off student loans, [support] more low-income housing, and [target] renewable energy creation and use.”
Supports charters and their ongoing financing. The congresswoman has supported multiple pieces of legislation that allowed “grants to go directly to charter schools” and that sustained the federal Charter Schools Program.
Supports more pay for educators. The congresswoman from Hawaii acknowledges that “teachers need to be paid more.” She observes that “this administration [Trump] has put a higher premium on personal enrichment than they have on improving education.”
Voted against vouchers. When the Republican-led Congress voted to reauthorize the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program, Gabbard voted “no.”
Supports the safety of communities. Gabbard supports banning assault weapons, instituting universal background checks, and restricting high capacity magazines. She also believes in “closing the gun-show loophole,” and has cosponsored a variety of gun control legislation.
Supports STEAM. The congresswoman promotes science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM ) as “critical to today’s competitive, globalized economy.” She supports expanding access to “federal STEAM programs,” including related “standards, teacher quality, and accountability.”
Supports making college more affordable. “Student loan debt has spun out of control, becoming a crippling financial burden to many young people and their families. It is time to provide real help … to make college more affordable.” The senator also believes in investing in community and technical colleges, apprenticeships, and STEM programs.
Congress is hurting students by not investing in education. She is an original cosponsor of the Keep Our Promise to America’s Children and Teachers (PACT) Act. The bill prioritizes special education funding and access to quality public education. “Congress has an obligation … to fully fund Title I and the Individuals with Disabilities Act—This bill will ensure that we don’t let our students down.”
Stands with unions and American workers. Criticized the Janus decision, vowing “we’ll stand with American workers and stand up against this attempt to weaken unions.” She is a cosponsor of the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act, which ensure “public sector employees … have the legal right to form and join a union.”
What about class size? As a proponent of public schools, the senator believes, “we … need to make sure all our children can get a great education.” She specifically references the importance of “increasing teacher pay and funding for our public schools, with a focus on investment in areas that need it the most.” Reducing class sizes is not mentioned.
“Yes, but …” on universal pre-K. When asked, “Should the federal government fund and implement a national, free universal pre-K program?” she responded “yes,” but “free for low-income families.”
Nothing is free. The senator maintains a practical approach for addressing “the rising costs of college.” She supports loan forgiveness “for in-demand occupations” and student loan refinance options, but she does not support free college, saying, “I wish … we could afford it.” At most, she supports “expanded Pell grants, and tuition-free one- and two-year community college degrees and technical certifications.”
Cosponsored the Paycheck Fairness Act. In pressing the need for equal pay, the senator emphasizes that “lower wages for women impact them not only while they’re working but also through retirement” and that “pay equity is not just about salaries, but also about giving women equal opportunity to enter male-dominated jobs.”
Supports a pathway toward universal coverage. The senator from Minnesota supports universal healthcare coverage, but believes that a public option is needed as the country progresses toward Medicare for All. Klobuchar proposes a practical approach that “would allow states to create public health insurance plans through Medicaid.” She also proposes that “premiums would be capped at a maximum of 9.5 percent of family income.” In addition, she supports new tax credits for caregivers and increased resources for Alzheimer’s research.
We need infrastructure not tax cuts. The senator would trade President Trump’s $1.5 trillion tax cut for a $1 trillion infrastructure investment to “create millions of good-paying American jobs.” She has a plan “to rebuild America’s roads and bridges and upgrade other critical infrastructure systems.” She also supports employer tax credits “to boost retirement savings” and “expanding the earned income credit and the child care credit.”
Unclear where she stands on charter schools. Although she opposes private school vouchers, Klobuchar has not articulated a position on charter schools. She has discussed “holding charter schools to ‘high standards.'” When asked about her support for charter schools, the candidate did not respond to questioning, but has offered that “I don’t think you see me focusing on charter schools when you look back on my career.”
Supports a raise for educators. The senator from Minnesota included increases for pay in her proposal for “Progress Partnerships.” Her plan would provide “matching federal funds to states that increase teacher pay.”
Opposes vouchers. When asked on a candidate questionnaire, “Do you support using public money in the form of vouchers or tax credits for private or religious school education?” the candidate responded, “No.”
Communities should not have to live with gun violence. The senator supports banning assault weapons, instituting universal background checks, and restricting high-capacity magazines. She reports that “the gun homicide rate … is 25 times higher than other developed countries,” and she has outlined immediate executive actions she would take “to address gun violence” if elected president.
Supports targeted upgrades for schools. The senator’s “Progress Partnerships” would provide additional resources to “update high school curricula to prepare students for the workforce, and repair school infrastructure in a way that ‘ensures equity.'”
College should be free. The country can afford to make community college free and waive tuition at four-year institutions for families earning less than $125,000 annually. In also pushing more student loan forgiveness, the senator believes “higher education is a right.”
Wealth should not determine quality education. Public education investments should ensure that there is no difference in schools in wealthy or low-income communities, and he affirms that “I believe guaranteeing resource equity is a core tenet of the federal government’s role.”
Believes working families are under assault. After the Janus decision, the senator stated that “we must redouble our efforts to make it easier, not harder, to join a union.” Throughout his career, he has supported raising the minimum wage, labor unions and worker co-ops, and policies that give “workers the time and resources to spend meaningful time with their loved ones.”
Reducing class size is right. The senator believes in the “fight to equitably fund our schools.” His plan for education calls for providing the necessary “resources needed to shrink class sizes.”
Equity starts with universal pre-K. According to the senator, it is imperative for the federal government to provide universal pre-K for every child in America. When access to pre-K is widely available, he believes these programs “help level the playing field.”
Denounces tax breaks over free college. As the sponsor of the College for All Act, the senator supports waiving tuition at public colleges and capping interest rates on loans. He believes the federal government can afford to help ease the burden of college costs and student loan debt, since “we can give a trillion dollars in tax breaks to people who don’t need it.”
Supports equal pay for equal work. The senator is a cosponsor of the Paycheck Fairness Act and has included “pay equity for women workers” in his 12-point economic agenda.” According to the senator, “we need pay equity in our country.”
The OG of Medicare for All. His proposal, to which every presidential candidate refers, “would replace job-based and individual private health insurance with a government-run plan that guarantees coverage for all with no premiums, deductibles and only minimal copays for certain services.” The senator has long believed that “the function of a rational healthcare system is not to make billions for insurance companies and drug companies. It is to provide healthcare to every man, woman, and child as a human right.”
Wall Street needs to pay up. Sanders has proposed a new 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights. His plan “establishes that all Americans are entitled to … a living wage, quality healthcare, complete education, affordable housing, a clean environment, and a secure retirement.” The senator believes that his vision is possible by eliminating tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy, “raising taxes on the fossil fuel industry,” and creating “a higher, progressive estate tax.”
Pay educators the salaries they deserve, including higher starting salaries. The senator from Vermont proposes that “teacher starting salaries should be at least $60,000.” He does not understand how “a nation that can pay baseball players hundreds of millions of dollars … can’t afford to pay teachers the salaries they deserve.” Sanders also supports the federal government subsidizing teacher pay.
Opposes vouchers. The senator has clearly expressed his opposition to private school vouchers. He affirms that he is “strongly opposed to any voucher system that would redirect public education dollars.”
Believes in solutions to end gun violence. Sanders supports banning assault weapons, implementing universal background checks, and restricting high capacity magazines. He says that he is “running for president because we must end the epidemic of gun violence … [and] take on the NRA.”
Students need equal access to well-resourced and compassionate schools. The senator’s “Thurgood Marshall Plan for public education” includes proposals to triple Title I funding and invest “$5 billion on summer and after-school programs.” He also supports the “end of restraint and seclusion schools” and has pledged that he “would end federal incentives for ‘zero-tolerance’ school discipline policies.”
Education is a right. The activist and billionaire believes that equal opportunity and access to education go hand-in-hand. He challenges the government to “protect the right to a free, quality, public education from preschool through college and on to skills training.”
Raised over a $1 billion for public schools. After leaving a lucrative career as a hedge fund manager, the billionaire turned to activism full time. In dedicating all of his time to “making America more just,” he also “helped close a massive corporate tax loophole to generate at least $1.7 billion for public schools.”
Houston, we have a wage problem. Steyer believes that the country “does not have an unemployment problem … [but] a wage problem.” He believes that “one job should be enough.” He supports wrestling the country back from the control of major corporations, and has sided with workers in strikes over pay and working conditions.
Supports reducing class sizes. The activist and billionaire has offered his support for educators “fighting for better schools.” He applauded the Los Angeles teachers strike, and he endorsed their fight for “smaller classes.”
The answer is YES. When asked, “Should the federal government fund and implement a national, free universal pre-K program?” he responded “yes,” and it should be “free for everyone.”
Educators deserve loan forgiveness. Steyer supports student loan forgiveness for educators and other public service employees. He’s appalled that “America’s hardworking educators” were not granted the student loan forgiveness they were promised. He believes, “we must make student loan forgiveness available to more than 1 percent of applicants.”
Admits the country is far from real pay equity. In recognizing Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, the activist reflected “on how much work there is left to do.” He acknowledges that “we will not truly achieve equality until we close the gender and racial pay gaps.”
The government is responsible for universal healthcare. The activist and billionaire supports the concept and intent of Medicare for All, but believes in the availability of a public option. “I am not in favor of telling 150 million Americans who get their healthcare through their employment, including a bunch of union workers, that by fiat they can’t do that any longer.” “A public option…is so much cheaper and better.”
Supports a wealth tax. He believes that wealthy Americans need to “help level the economic playing field and generate revenue for programs to help middle- and lower-income families.” Steyer has proposed instituting a new 1 percent annual wealth tax on the country’s top 0.1 percent of earners.
Candidate has not provided statements on charter schools or related accountability measures.
Has not mentioned compensation for educators. The activist and billionaire supports educators, but has not weighed in with a specific proposal or comment on pay. He blasts the “Republican agenda of demonizing teachers, framing public education as a costly burden, and gutting education spending.” He acknowledges that “virtually all our public school teachers spend some of their own pay on school supplies for their classes.”
Supports public education. Although he has not provided specific comments or a position on vouchers, Steyer supports “free public education” and “has endorsed a progressive policy platform in line with Sanders’s and Warren’s agenda.” (Both Warren and Sanders oppose public financing for private school vouchers.)
Supports more diversity in STEM. He believes that “every American deserves equal access to a quality education.” The activist and billionaire recognizes the impact and opportunities presented by advancements in technology, and as president, plans “to ensure that the faces in our STEM classrooms reflect the faces we see in the world around us.”
Supports private school vouchers. His administration proposes $5 billion in tax credits “that would fund scholarships to private schools.” The president believes that “to help working parents, the time has come to pass school choice for America’s children.”
Let them eat cake. After passing a $1.5 trillion tax cut that benefited corporations and the ultra-wealthy, the president’s budget request for education includes more than $7 billion in cuts. Although Congress will not support these proposed cuts, the Trump administration does not believe the federal government should support teacher development, public service student loan forgiveness, and higher education research.
Opposes unions and the rights of workers. Publicly the president aligns himself with American workers, but supports “decreased labor protections, rolled back worker safety and weakened federal unions.” In celebrating the Janus decision, he tweeted “non-union workers are…able to support a candidate of his or her choice without having those who control the Union deciding for them.”
Bigger is better. His administration proposed a budget that would cut federal education spending by more than 10 percent. Justifying these cuts before Congress, his hand-picked secretary of education, Betsy Devos, explained on behalf of the administration, “Students may be better served by being in larger classes, if by hiring fewer teachers, a district or state can better compensate those who have demonstrated high ability and outstanding results.”
Don’t be fooled. Although he called for the “elimination of the Preschool Development Grants program,” the program survived but was altered. Under his administration these funds no longer “help states expand or create preschool programs for 4-year-olds from low-income families.” They now are for “building partnerships … sharing best practices among providers … and maximizing parent choice and knowledge about early-childhood options.”
Pell in the summertime. After pressure from community college representatives, his administration reinstated summer Pell eligibility. Reports suggest “that the federal government’s reinstatement of year-round Pell eligibility last year may be helping to stem overall enrollment declines.” According to the president, “Low-income students will now have access to these funds over Summer and Winter breaks so they can earn their degrees faster with fewer loans.”
Loans for leverage. Suggested that the federal government eliminate the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program and restrict student loan borrowing “to force colleges and universities to either cap tuition increases, or even lower tuition.” Says the president, “Student loan debt. I’m going to work to fix it … I’ve always been very good with loans. I love loans. I love other people’s money.”
Fair pay is not the American Dream. According the president, pay disparities between men and women are difficult to address because “it’s very hard to say what is the same job.” He also offered that, “[if] you start to say everybody gets equal pay, you get away from the whole American Dream … and if everyone gets the same … you’re into a socialistic society.” Meanwhile his administration has tried to roll back rules that support pay equity, and has tripled the gender pay gap among White House employees.
Supports healthcare providers over people who need coverage. Although he promotes that his administration is “providing greater access to more affordable health insurance options,” he has done the opposite. His first term is marked by repeal of the individual mandate, opening more access for insurance agents versus people who need healthcare, and eliminating “federal payments that help reduce deductibles and out-of-pocket costs for low-income participants.” The president views the work of this administration as “promises kept.”
That was easy! Let’s do it again. Emboldened by the inequitable economy created from his $1.5 trillion tax cut, the president is exploring executive actions to bypass Congress to deliver another $200 billion tax cut for wealthy Americans. The White House wants “to ensure … [it] takes effect before … reelection 2020,” but stands by its ongoing calls for billions of dollars in cuts for public schools.
Supports increases in funding for charter schools. The Trump administration proposed a $60 million increase for federal Charter School Programs. In his commitment to school choice, including vouchers, the president supports using “Title I funding [for] public school choice.” In outlining his achievements, the president references “$1 billion for school choice and $250 million to promote private school choice.” He famously quipped that “school choice, charter schools, vouchers, even opportunity scholarships … [are] the American way.”
Deal with it. His administration consistently calls for significant cuts to public education, including grants “for teacher salary and training.” The president believes that such programs are “ineffective, duplicative of other activities, or better funded by state and local government.” For a select group of educators, the president has proposed “increased compensation for highly effective teachers, particularly in the STEM fields.”
He loves vouchers. Before he took office, the president-elect proposed “a $20 billion federal voucher program,” setting aside a potentially significant boon to private schools nationwide. Although Congress opposes many of his budget cuts, his administration has called for more than $7 billion in education funding reductions, and continues to propose billions of dollars in new tax credits “that would fund scholarships to private schools.”
Guns don’t kill people. After visiting victims of the El Paso mass shooting, the deaths of 22 innocent people did not dissuade President Trump from affirming that “there is no political appetite for a ban on assault rifles.” Indicating an openness to expanded background checks, the president now says, “this is a mental health problem …. It’s not the gun that pulls the trigger.” Although his administration banned bump stocks, with the president stating, “I don’t care if Congress does it or not,” he has reversed restrictions on mentally disabled people acquiring guns and opposes gun-free zones. The president also supports arming educators and using federal resources to “to buy guns and train teachers.”
Congress won’t let him cut 21st Century Community Learning Centers. If the president had his way, he would have denied after-school programs and summer enrichment programs to almost two million students nationwide. He believes that his administration’s ReThink School Tour was a success, as federal resources were used to “showcase … innovative solutions … in expanding school choice.” The president did, however, donate $100,000 of his salary … [to] be used to help fund a STEM-focused camp at the Education Department.”
Policy is local. The talk show host and former congressman believes “educational reform … begin[s] at the local and state level.” If needed locally, he supports providing schools “qualified teachers in the classroom … [and] financial resources for computers and other teaching aids.” While serving in Congress, he pledged to protect “the rights of local communities and leaders in determining their educational future.”
Schools need competition, not more resources. Instead supporting funding and incentives for public schools, he supports “advancing school choice.” According to Walsh, “America’s public school system will never improve until it is forced to compete to keep its students.”
Anti-worker, anti-union, and anti-educator. In 2012, when the Chicago Teachers Union “walked out in its first strike in 25 years, the talk show host and former congressman wasted no time railing against educators for “turning their backs on … students … stuck in subpar schools receiving a failing education.” He did not support the union’s right to advocate for better pay and benefits and very publicly accused them of greed. While serving in Congress, he also voted to defund the National Labor Relations Board, and he supported collective bargaining restrictions in the federal government.
The candidate has not provided any public statements addressing or referencing class size.
The candidate has not provided any public statements addressing or referencing access to pre-K programs.
Compares addressing student loans to buying votes. The talk show host and former Congressman describes efforts to engage students on college costs as “running around from interest group to interest group promising things [like] student loans …[to go] after the youth vote.” He likens conversations with student groups to “buying votes.”
No one is entitled to fair and equitable wages. When confronted with the statement, “every American deserves a fair wage,” the talk show host and former congressman responded with “Says who? In America, all you deserve is life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
The government doesn’t owe you healthcare. The talk show host and former congressman believes that “the proper role of government is to protect equal rights, not provide equal things.” He supports “healthcare choice,” limitations on suing for medical malpractice, and providing access to flexible healthcare spending accounts.
Believes half of the country doesn’t pay taxes anyway. He doesn’t disagree that the wealthy should “pay their fair-share,” but believes society is better served through the generosity of trickle down resources provided through reducing tax rates and eliminating the alternative minimum and estate taxes.
Supports charter schools and other choice options. He describes charter schools, vouchers, and home schooling as “win-win.” Walsh “taught underprivileged inner city youths and led an organization to provide private school scholarships.” He “firmly believe[s] in school choice and … that every child should have the choice of attending any school for which he/she qualifies academically.” The Republican candidate reports that “in areas where kids are given vouchers to attend private schools, the kids who get the vouchers get a better education and increased competition forces the public schools to provide a better education.”
Offers no support for educator pay. The talk show host and former congressman is no fan of public schools. When comparisons were made about the compensation of professional athletes versus educators, he responded that “‘we’ [the public] don’t pay baseball players hundreds of millions of dollars. Their employers do.”
Supports private school vouchers. Recalling his experience teaching “underprivileged inner-city youths” and serving as head of a group that provided “private school scholarships to outstanding students trapped in underperforming public schools,” he supports expanding access to vouchers. He has described teacher unions fearing vouchers because they are “scared of seeing kids have the opportunity to break-free from their failing educational systems.”
“Happy shooting, kids.” Walsh endorsed a fictional program “sight unseen” that would train and arm children with guns. Learning later that the program did not exist, he admitted, “Yeah, I got fooled.” However, he believes “we do not need any more anti-gun laws” and supports carrying concealed weapons and removing any barriers to interstate gun purchases. In reference to arming teachers, he said, “Good. Teachers, properly trained and armed, can help protect students. Well done, Florida.”
The candidate has not released or commented on a plan for 21st century schools.
Believes that ‘you have to have been there.’ If elected, the Senator has promised that the next Secretary of Education will have experience as a “public school teacher, believes in public education, and will listen to our public school teachers, parents, and students.” She believes this perspective is essential to ensuring that the country will “live up to the promise of a high-quality public education for every student.”
Public schools need dollars and sense. For every student to “have the resources they need to get a great public education,” the Senator would quadruple Title I funding, invest $50 billion in school infrastructure, and fully fund IDEA. She believes the country needs a “historic new federal investment in public schools – [that] pushes both the federal government and state governments to dedicate more resources to the schools and students that need them most.”
Upholds strong collective bargaining rights. As Chicago educators were on strike, the Senator joined them in solidarity, while offering “the unions are how we have power. The unions are how we make sure that the needs of every one of our children are heard loud and clear.” In the Senate, she has supported bills to repeal right-to-work laws and make workplace-organizing easier. She believes “if we want to protect workers…that means banning states from imposing restrictions that prevent workers from joining together to fight for their future.”
Supports increasing funds to reduce class size. The Senator acknowledges that “educators have taken matters into their own hands.” She sides with the “#RedforED movement…to increase funding to reduce class sizes and improve…schools.” As a Senator, she also cosponsors the Smaller Class Sizes for Students and Educators Act. Legislation that “prioritizes funding for high-poverty school districts to reduce class size.”
She has a plan for pre-K too. To help working families, she proposes “that anyone making under 200 percent of the federal poverty level … be eligible for… free pre-kindergarten programs.” She also recommends that families above this line be eligible for discounts, including that “preschools would charge a maximum of 7 percent of that family’s income” for programs.
Believes universal free college is possible. The senator prefers to cancel all student loan debt as opposed to reducing it. She has a plan that calls for a new “2 percent annual tax on families with $50 million or more.” This “Ultra-Millionaire Tax … would cancel up to $50,000 in debt for 42 million Americans.”
The current debate over equal pay is humiliating. The senator is disappointed that the country still has to recognize Equal Pay Day. Recognition of ongoing wage disparities between men and women represents a “national day of embarrassment.” She continues to advocate for equal pay and is a cosponsor of the Paycheck Fairness Act.
What no plan?! The senator from Massachusetts supports Medicare for All, but has not offered a specific plan on expanding access to healthcare. She believes that “the basic profit model of an insurance company is taking as much money as you can in premiums and pay out as little as possible in healthcare coverage.” According to the senator, “that is not working.” As president, she plans to “pull everyone to the table” to craft a healthcare plan.
She has a way to level the playing field. The senator supports policies that give every American an opportunity to thrive. She believes that applying an Ultra-Millionaire Tax that includes “a … 2 percent tax on … fortunes over $50 million” is the right solution for closing the wealth gap and laying the foundation for more Americans “to create wealth and a bright future for themselves and their loved ones.”
She’s ok with public charters, but won’t fund them. Although she has opposed their expansion, Warren has said that “many charter schools in Massachusetts are producing extraordinary results for our students.” However, these results are related “to tight oversight, a prohibition on for-profit charters, and a limit on growth of charters in the state.” If elected president, she has pledged to not request federal funding for charter schools. The senator also “supports banning for-profits and increasing accountability” over existing charter schools.
Supports increasing pay for educators. The Senator believes that the federal government should subsidize teacher pay where resources are scarce. By quadrupling Title I funding, she believes that this will help incentivize states to increase “teacher pay with the goal of closing the educator pay gap and also paying paraprofessionals and other education support professionals a living wage.”
Opposes vouchers. When asked on a candidate questionnaire, “Do you support using public money in the form of vouchers or tax credits for private or religious school education,” the candidate responded, “no.” The Senator believes, “we have a responsibility to provide great neighborhood schools for every student,” and “we should stop the diversion of public dollars from traditional public schools through vouchers or tuition tax credits.”
She’s had enough. Stating that “enough is enough,” the Senator proposes a plan that would reduce gun deaths 80% by “rein[ing] in an out-of-control gun industry.” She believes that “no teacher should be armed – period.”
Students need additional supports for their success. In preparing students for the jobs of tomorrow, the Senator does not what to neglect what they are facing today. She supports community schools, more resources for meal programs, and expanded access to mental health services. She has called for dismantling “the school-to-prison pipeline,” supporting “implicit bias training to reduce suspensions and expulsions,” and incentivizing the use of more “trauma-informed alternative discipline practices.”
Does not support money for nothing. To address deep resource inequities, the governor signed legislation pegged as the “grand bargain … more money in exchange for standards and accountability.” According to the governor, “I was in favor of both halves of it.”
He funded his mandate. When landmark education legislation passed in 1993, it included “over $1 billion in extra education funding—mostly to poor communities.” Galled by funding disparities, he stated, “If you want a great education, you do have to pay for it.”
Opposes the right to bargain. Hired significant staff from the Pioneer Institute, a think tank affiliated with efforts to roll back collective bargaining for public employees. He once described teachers unions as “retrograde” and “medieval.”
Supports smaller government instead. The former Massachusetts governor “favors shrinking the government overall, including eliminating the Education Department.” He not has not expressed an interest in reducing class sizes.
No consideration for universal pre-K. The fiscal conservative has called for “abolishing the Department of Education.” Although he supported increasing school standards as governor, he has not made any statements on access to universal pre-K.
Open to free tuition for displaced workers. The former governor supports expanding access to online courses, and he also supports free in-state tuition at community colleges for displaced workers. He warns, “If we don’t do this, the door to the middle class may be closed to the working poor.”
The candidate has not provided any public statements addressing or referencing fair pay or pay equity.
Believes Medicaid should be widely accessible. The former governor of Massachusetts previously requested “additional funding for Medicaid” in the state. As a supporter of the program, “he … relaxed the state’s Medicaid requirements … to increase healthcare access.”
Supports Trump’s massive tax cuts. Weld admits “the president’s decision to be divisive … was a cynical move … but it … had some success … there was a certain amount of economic insecurity out there.” Despite their differences, he offers, “I liked the tax bill … I always like taking money off the table so the government can’t spend it.”
Believes charter schools should be fully funded too. The self-described “most vocal proponent of charter schools” believes that “funding for charter schools should mirror that of other public schools as closely as possible.” He also believes that “too many U.S. charter schools have grown complacent, replicating the mediocre achievement of traditional district schools.”
Does not mention educator pay. The former governor has a variety of education beliefs and proposals that do not include compensating educators. He supports more school choice and home schooling. He has consistently called for “abolishing the U. S. Department of Education, [and supports] transferring decision-making authority to the states and the parents of school-age and college-age children.”
Supports private school vouchers. As governor, he proposed a plan that would “expand voucher use to private schools.” He also believes that “we’ve got to give vouchers a chance. There is something to this.”
Things change when you run for president. Weld previously supported banning assault weapons and preventing gun sales to anyone under 21, but he has updated his position, stating “restricting gun rights doesn’t make us safer, and threatens our constitutional freedoms.”
Supports expanding access to online education. The former governor believes that more consideration should be given to online education. “We can make it possible for people to acquire … skills, and recent research has shown that online education is just as sticky as the little red schoolhouse, the social learning that we all grew up with.”
Supports a “whole person educational system.” The noted author and motivational speaker supports universal preschool and a vast “array of educational approaches, including social and emotional learning; the development of conflict resolution skills; restorative justice; meditation and mindfulness; anti-bullying programs; [and reducing] high stakes testing.” She believes that education can address “the heart and soul as well as the intellect.”
Education investments should honor the “whole person.” As president, she would include “increased funding for free and reduced-price lunches,” and “federal compensation for state school funding.” She believes that these priorities address the disparities associated with childhood poverty and unequal access to quality education.
Supports workers’ rights, protections, and more workplace benefits. To counteract policies that are only serving the top 1 percent, her plan for the economy includes increasing the minimum wage to reflect “a living wage,” protecting the rights of “working people to organize for better wages and working conditions,” and requiring employers to offer paid vacation, “even for part-time employees.”
Supports smaller class sizes. The best-selling author understands that “we also need to ensure that teachers face classrooms of a manageable size.” Her plans for education include providing sufficient resources to hire “more teachers overall” and “shrink” the ratio of students to teachers.
The answer is YES. When asked, “Should the federal government fund and implement a national, free universal pre-K program” she responded “yes,” and it should be “free for everyone.”
Supports free college and student loan relief. The author and motivation speaker supports free college, including technical schools. To address overwhelming student loan debt, she proposes “student loan amnesty,” which includes student loan forgiveness, interest rate reductions for repayment, and removing “the annual caps on federally subsidized loans.”
Believes in equal pay for equal work. She supports policies that address wage disparities between men and women, and touts “equal pay for equal work” as a solution to help close the income gap.
The country needs Medicare for All. Although her plan would allow individuals to keep their private insurance, the best-selling author believes in focusing on disease prevention, enhanced health technologies, and improved integration of nutrition programs in schools. She believes that “there is no way to measure the amount of money that does not enter our economy based on the fact that so many Americans are too stressed and anxious to create and produce at the level that they otherwise could.”
Would repeal Trump tax cuts. Williamson supports repealing the 2017 tax cuts and passing a series of fixes to help small business owners and middle-class families. She favors “an additional 3 percent tax on billionaires … raising the estate tax” and increasing taxes on Wall Street.
Candidate has not provided statements on charter schools or related accountability measures.
Supports more pay for educators. The best-selling author and motivational speaker supports public schools and educators. Unlike some other candidates, she has not recommended “a specific dollar amount,” but she does “agree … that we need to pay teachers a lot more.”
Opposes vouchers. When asked on a candidate questionnaire, “Do you support using public money in the form of vouchers or tax credits for private or religious school education?” the candidate responded, “No.”
Schools should focus on the whole person. Williamson supports “a far more expansive array of educational approaches.” Her plan proposes “social and emotional learning … development of conflict resolution skills; restorative justice; [and] meditation and mindfulness.” She believes that the education system should address “the heart and soul as well as the intellect.”
Wants every student to be supported and prepared for the future. As technology gives and takes, the former entrepreneur believes that universal preschool, career and technical education, and college affordability are essential. He shares that “I have many friends who work in technology and they know … what we did to the manufacturing jobs … retail jobs … call center jobs. So we need to think much bigger about how we’re going to help Americans transition through this time.”
Supports investing where it counts. Expressing concern that “emphasizing rote academic skills in the age of supercomputers is not preparing our people for what’s to come,” he calls for specific investments in early childhood education, technical training, arts education, and tuition-free community college.
Labor needs a “game changer.” As unions adjust to turbulent times and new realities, he believes that access to Universal Basic Income would provide the financial reliability for workers to “increase worker bargaining power … and … push harder against exploitative labor conditions.”
Supports expanding class size at universities. In a policy twist, the entrepreneur does not address reducing class size in the early grades, but has a focus on expanding class sizes at the nation’s “highly elite universities” to prevent fraud and corruption in admissions.
Supports universal pre-K. Yang is a proponent of early childhood education, and he has proposed ensuring universal access to pre-K programs for 3- and 4-year-olds.
He’s been there. The entrepreneur admits to owing “tens of thousands for years after graduating.” As a presidential candidate, he is calling for a “bailout” to help reduce outstanding student loans across the board. He also plans to create a grant program “that forgives student debt for those who work in rural areas or with underprivileged populations.” He bluntly believes, “we have to stop screwing young people and sticking them with the bill.”
He’s ready to fight for equal pay. The entrepreneur has a plan to address wage differences between men and women, including the even deeper disparities with women of color. His plan calls for “working with states to implement salary disclosure laws, requiring federal contractors to pay employees equally and launching new studies around pay equity in the federal workforce.”
Supports team Medicare for all. The entrepreneur believes that “with a shift to a Medicare for All system, costs can also be controlled directly by setting prices provided for medical services.” As president, he vows to work cooperatively with Congress and “shift the way doctors are compensated to promote holistic and empathic care.” He also supports the federal government creating “incentives for and invest[ing] in innovative treatment methods and methodologies.”
He supports a new value added tax. Yang has centered his campaign on ensuring that everyone receives $1,000 per month as universal basic income. To pay for this benefit, he proposes establishing “a new 10 percent value added [or consumption] tax.” He also “wants to end favorable tax treatment for capital gains and carried interest,” and he thinks it would be “fun” if everyone could choose a government project “to direct 1 percent of their taxes.”
On both sides. Claims there are good charter schools and bad charter schools, and offered, “I have friends who have put their heart and soul into charter schools for underprivileged kids who were being failed by our public school system.” Stated that “we should…[put] resources into both schools.”
Has not committed to a position on vouchers. When asked on a candidate questionnaire, “Do you support using public money in the form of vouchers or tax credits for private or religious school education?” Yang did not respond. The entrepreneur has only offered to “work with states to fund their educational systems.”
Students need to be prepared for the new economy. As more jobs vanish as a result of technology advancements, Yang is concerned that Americans are not prepared. His education plan calls for expanding access to vocational education, providing “free financial counseling for all,” and ensuring students have access to “life skills in all high schools.”