Educators speak out for students at non-inclusive presidential education summit

by Félix Pérez

Take Action ›

Don’t miss out on the kind of education, legislative and political news you can only get with EdVotes. Click here ›

Teachers are accustomed to advocating for their students. Yesterday, educators from New Hampshire, Connecticut and Maine took their advocacy to a much bigger platform, as they rallied outside a presidential education summit in Londonderry, NH, that featured six leading Republican candidates.

Moderated by school privatization proponent and former CNN anchor Campbell Brown and sponsored by the American Federation for Children, an organization whose mission is to take public taxpayer funding from public schools and use it for private school vouchers, for-profit charter schools, online schools and home schooling, the education summit drew the interest of educators as an opportunity to shine a light on the education records of the five summit participants who are current or former governors.

NH teacher Allison Estes-Brown
NH teacher Allison Estes-Browne

“I feel very strongly these candidates don’t stand for what’s best for students. And the fact that educators’ voices are not included in a so-called education summit says a lot,” said Allison Estes-Browne, a special education teacher for 14 years at Plymouth Elementary School. “For some reason, it seems they want to disregard the professionals who are with students every day and who know the students best. It is wrong, and that’s why we’re here today.”

Participating in the summit were former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former CEO Carly Fiorina, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. Each candidate engaged in a 45-minute one-on-one with Brown. All the candidates support private school vouchers and the expansion of private charter schools. Bush, Walker, Kasich and Jindal are known for their outsize education cuts and aggressive targeting of teacher-led unions and public service employees.

“We’re a major stakeholder in the success of our students and our schools. I find it offensive to have these candidates come into our backyard and not include educators in what is supposed to be a nonpartisan forum about education of all things,” said Stephen Tallo, a mathematics teacher at Londonderry High School, the site of the summit. “It’s unfortunate these candidates believe they can go it alone, because students and any public school in America is best served by using a team-oriented approach that includes educators.”

An educator for 35 years, Tallo added:

Those candidates in there don’t have the best interests of our students at heart. I know the students walking the halls of Londonderry High School and take pride in all of my students. Yet as an educator in this community, neither I nor any of my colleagues were asked to be a participant in that forum.

The noninclusive approach of the summit organizers and candidates was perhaps best exemplified when a teacher who was a confirmed ticket holder to the event was denied entrance. “We have the right to refuse anybody. It’s a private event,” a summit representative stationed at the school entrance told high school English teacher Penny Culliton. The representative then directed Culliton, who was on a sidewalk outside the school, to leave the property.

Inside the event, the candidates largely stuck to their canned talking points and made little news. There were, however, a few instances when they dropped their guard and showed the audience the depth of their disrespect and animosity toward educators. Gov. Christie repeated his statement that teacher-led unions deserve a “political punch in the face.” Governor Kasich, who bills himself a moderate and attracted national attention in 2011 when his law to silence the workplace voice of teachers and other public service employees was repealed by voters, stated, “If I were, not president, but if were king in America, I would abolish all teachers’ lounges where they sit together and worry, ‘How woe is us.’ “ed summit rally insert

Lily Eskelsen-García, Utah elementary school teacher and National Education Association president, brushed aside Kasich’s comment. “In Ohio, John Kasich took resources out of public school classrooms to provide vouchers for private schools that don’t provide opportunity to every child, slashed public school funding by half a billion dollars, and expanded unaccountable for-profit charter schools that misspent millions while producing some of the worst outcomes in the nation. Educators will absolutely discuss how they can overcome these obstacles to help their students, as well as hold elected leaders accountable.”

Despite the refusal of summit organizers to include them and the mean-spirited jabs, the spirit of the 100 educators present was upbeat and determined.

“I don’t have to be, and we as educators don’t have to be, millionaires to have a voice for our students,” said Estes-Browne. “Educating all of our students is the best investment we can make in our future — nothing is more important.”

8 responses to “Educators speak out for students at non-inclusive presidential education summit

  1. I have real problems with some of the comments about education by some of the Republican nominees. However, the AFT has already endorsed Hillary and she is the odds on favorite for the same from the NEA, before even getting the nomination. What exactly is the difference?

  2. And sadly, I am having trouble finding ANY politician who truly supports public education for all. It is their actions, more than their words, that worries me.

  3. Most politicians, but especially those in the GOP camp, owe their elections to moneyed, special interests (Super PACS and Right Wing Think Tanks, populated with well-heeled, well-connected CEO types from Corporate America, Wall Street, and their legal teams of experts and advisors, etc.), whose only concern is profit margins and their market share. Public schools, and the public capital that funds them have become an attractive

    1. (continued) new source of capital if private firms can just get their hands on it. The GOP has made it abundantly clear through their rhetoric that the USA government is the enemy that cannot do anything right. The push for privatization has the smell of $$$MONEY$$$, $$$MONEY$$$, $$$MONEY$$$ all about it. Students? Mere gambits in the pursuit of capital gains…

  4. I agree that charter and private schools limit the number of high needs students that they will take. Public schools have to educate all students-not just the brightest, not just those with the correct ethnicity (limited number also of students with English as a second language) , not just the more well to do, and not just limited number of special education students at all times.

    Research shows that when parents take the time to pick their students school, they have more interest in how they are performing. Public schools take all students, not just those with more interested parents.

    In my public school district a middle school program for a computer approach to providing education (every student was provided with a computer and curriculum was more computer based)had great results. Two things emerged-when parents pick or entered a lottery to have their students in the program, it made a difference in outcomes. Also because of the curriculum, they limited the number of high needs students like special education, English as a second language, disciple difficulties, low performing students, etc. They had great results; just like many private and charter schools.

    My concern with this providing of a privileged education for some students is that when their parents are gone and their generation has to deal with large numbers of grown ups who had less of a chance for a good education and now have limited job skills; they may have a very contentious time-like riots etc. Parents need to be concerned for all students not just their own privileged children. What kind of a world will their children inherit?

    1. I’m just reading this now, but felt compelled to reply. I’m a single mother and teacher of 20 years. I do not feel because I choose to place my child in a private high school, that he is privileged. A proper education environment for him is worth the extra money and sacrifice I choose to make in other areas of our lives. From k-8th grade he had not been given the enrichment opportunities that would have provide him an appropriate education. However, the special education students, where most of the school funding is used, received all the necessary supports that they were entitled to. My child sat in class bored and very observant as to what was actually going on in his classrooms. I’m currently dealing with a generation of young adults who don’t discipline students, enact “behavior plans” which give kids permission to misbehave a percentage of the time and get to pick a prize at the end of the week while students who behave all the time, get nothing. The real world is all about choice. Some parents make good choices and some do not. It is not my responsibility to correct all the mistakes others make. If parents can not be involved in their child’s schooling, or teach them how to behave, then maybe they should not be having children.

  5. It is frightening that these Republican candidates have so little regard for educators. To them ignorance is bliss. Its very important that come election time we get out the vote in order to save out schools.

  6. It has been obvious for years—especially since Jeb Bush was FL’s governor, that Republican politicians have been attempting—and unfortunately succeeding to a large extent, to destroy public education. Neither charter schools nor private schools educate every child. Vouchers will not open their children’s private schools to every child.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *