MD campaign highlights how too much standardized testing harms students

4 comments

by Brian Washington

Maryland educators are publicly adding their voices to a growing national chorus, including students, parents, and community leaders, who all say the standardized testing movement has failed.

They’ve launched a series of television ads now appearing on Baltimore and Washington, D.C. stations as part of a month-long campaign entitled, “Less Testing, More Learning.”

Take Action ›

If you live in Maryland, add your name to the list of those who want less testing and more learning in our public schools. Click here ›

The ads highlight how Maryland children and their hopes of receiving a quality, well-rounded education are being crushed by the weight of all the standardized tests students are asked to take.

“I think the commercials and the outcry both came from a very organic place,” said Keith Anderson, a high school English teacher in Silver Spring, who is also featured in one of the ads. “People all over the place are sensing that it has gone too far.”

The Baltimore Sun published a report last year that said 8th graders in Anne Arundel and Harford counties take at least 40 hours of tests annually.

Keith Anderson pic
Maryland educator Keith Anderson

Some Frederick County students last year had nearly a third of their class time eaten up by standardized tests. And during this past school year, in Carroll County, students took tests on all but 9-days between the end of winter break and close of the school year.

Meanwhile, Maryland students just got a new test added onto their schedule last year—the PARCC, which stands for Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.

Anderson says the tests don’t help students do better in school or in life. He adds the state’s current testing regime also robs students of opportunities to learn about those things outside of what’s on the tests, including art, music, and finance.

“If the only thing that’s driving us is what’s going to be on the test, then of course it’s going to hurt education,” said Anderson. “Education is about what’s happening in the room in front of you at that moment. It’s about what’s going on in a kid’s brain. However, all this testing is making our kids’ brains shut down and it eliminates any ‘in-the-moment’ educational opportunities in front of you.”

He says testing proponents believe, incorrectly, that if educators are held accountable for a rigid list of things they should be teaching, then students are getting a good education. However, Anderson believes this goes against real learning and ultimately hurts students.

The Less Testing, More Learning campaign, which also includes radio and digital ads, is sponsored by the 71,000 active and retired educators who make up the Maryland State Education Association (MSEA).

The goal is to get students, parents, and educators to turn up the heat and get their state and local lawmakers to cut the number of standardize tests students must take.

“This (the state’s current testing situation) can change,” said Anderson. “We’re not talking about some drastic change that is going to upset the very foundation of education. We’re talking about some common-sense changes that those of us who care about our students want to see get done.”

Reader Comments

  1. Bernie Sanders for President. He is pro union and won’t take corporate or Super PAC $. We have got to elect him and more like him and get the dirty money out of politics. Let’s take our country back.

  2. Follow the $$$money$$$.
    Standardized tests have become BIG BUSINESS with $$$Hundreds of Millions$$$ in federal money at stake.
    NCLB has ushered in the era of private corporations that develop “standardized tests” with quite a handsome $$$return$$$. The big four: Harcourt Educational Measurement, CTB McGraw-Hill, Riverside Publishing (a Houghton Mifflin company), and NCS Pearson are the recipients of the majority of federal money set aside in the federal budget ($11 Billion) to help States develop and administer tests. Their take is estimated to be from from $400 to $700 million in federal tax dollars (State costs not included).
    Testing our kids is not only profitable, but if the multiple choice questions’ answers are so ambiguous that even our most conscientious students are confused, imagine the plight of students less motivated. Flagging public school test score bodes well for the GOP backed push for the $$$privatization$$$ of public schools everywhere (beginning with underperforming public schools first, of course).
    That is why, if all public school children must take the test, then all private schools should be mandated to take the tests, too…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *