President’s budget disappoints educators concerned for students, working families

2 comments

By Amanda Litvinov

The budget blueprint released by the White House yesterday turned out to be a mixed bag for those who care about students, schools and working families.

Take Action ›

Support the President’s push to reverse damaging sequester cuts. Share our state-specific infographics with your networks. CLICK HERE.›

While the Administration’s budget pushes to increase education funding, expand access to early childhood education and reverse the damaging across-the-board sequester cuts just beginning to hit schools, there are proposed cuts to the social safety net that many educators say just aren’t right.

“I applaud the President’s efforts to fund our public schools. That said, I cannot support cuts to Social Security and Medicare,” said Bob Welsh, who works in transportation for Wisconsin’s Wauzeka-Steuben School District.

“My wife and I are low-income people who are just scraping by as it is, so any kind of cut to these programs could spell disaster for us,” continued Welsh, who is now in his seventies. “We campaigned very hard to elect and re-elect President Obama and we took to heart his promise that he would not touch or allow anyone else to interfere with Social Security and Medicare.”

The President’s proposal would cut Medicare and other health care programs by $400 billion. It would also lead to benefit cuts for Social Security recipients by abandoning the current cost-of-living payments that seniors rely on and using a new inflation formula known as chained C.P.I.

Karen Zyczynski
Karen Zyczynski

“Instead of cutting Social Security benefits to some of the most vulnerable members of society, many of whom are living on fixed incomes and  can least afford cuts to their income, why aren’t we closing tax loopholes for large corporations and discontinuing tax breaks for the gas and oil industry?” asked retired Michigan teacher Karen Zyczynski.

She was also frustrated with the Administration’s continued reliance on competitive grants to determine federal education funding for the states.

“Why are we forcing states to vie for education grants, which creates haves and have nots, instead of raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans?  Somehow we have our priorities mixed up.”

Still, the President’s budget does propose crucial new investments in early education totaling $75 billion that would allow all 4-year-olds to attend high-quality preschool programs.

“NEA members commend President Obama for his commitment to bring quality early childhood education to all children,” said math teacher and NEA President Dennis Van Roekel in a statement. “There are far too many kids without access to a full range of crucial programs like Head Start, pre–K, and full-day kindergarten that lead to long-term student success.”

NEA believes that a fair budget proposal should demand more of the wealthiest and corporations while staying true to our nation’s commitment to seniors, students and those most in need.

Educators helped push for the passage of the Senate budget proposed by Budget Committee Chair Patty Murray (D-Washington)—which goes the furthest to restore education funding and fairness for working families—late last month.

You can help advocate for equitable education funding for all students. Get involved with the Kids Not Cuts campaign today!

Reader Comments

  1. $113,700 is the cut-off for paying in to Social Security. $113,701 and up are untaxed. In 1979 there were 13 BILLIONAIRES. In 2009 there were over 400 BILLIONAIRES. A Billion dollars sitting on the market collecting a meager 5% return is $50,000,000! 50 MILLION, get it???

    Wealth consolidation at the top is a phenomenon that can no longer be denied. And to achieve it, our wealthiest citizens and corporations have lobbied incessantly for this favor in our legislature. Our tax codes (see history of marginal rates), Free Trade Agreements, and corporate welfare in the form of itemized deductions, credits, write-offs, subsidies, etc. have given unprecedented favor to our top earners and “multinationals” since before the Great Depression.

    Policies put in place coming out of the Great Depression, like the Employment Act of 1946 emphasized the establishment a vital middle class consumer market witnessed fabulous results during the ’50 & ’60s. 30 years of policies that favor the nation’s elite, moving us toward a Plutocracy have placed all the power and influence in the hands of America, Inc. (Citizens United vs The Federal Election Commission, “Corporations are People,” Money is Speech, Super PACs, etc.).

    Even in a free-market capitalist nation like the USA, our government can and should (indeed, our policy makers are the only ones who can, outside of a messy revolt) require its wealthy and powerful to occasionally become team players to save their nation from insolvency in times like these…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM

  2. It sickens me that after we had his back for 2 elections he would turn his back on social security recipients. It is totally disgusting and could be the reason Republicans take back the party in 2014. Thanks alot Barack Oliar…….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *