Posted in: Kids Not Cuts
President Obama stands strong for vital social safety net services in inaugural remarks
Tag inaugural speech, Medicaid, Medicare, President Barack Obama, Social Security
by Félix Pérez
President Barack Obama, addressing more than 1 million people gathered in the nation’s capital Monday, offered a full-throated defense of the nation’s most successful social safety net programs, Medicaid, Social Security and Medicare, which have lifted millions of elderly, children and families out of poverty and provided essential access to medical care.
Take Action ›
Stand with the more than 15,000 education champions who have signed the “Kids, Not Cuts” pledge. Click here ›
President Obama’s emphasis of the three programs in his inaugural remarks is telling in light of the high-stakes debate raging in Congress about how to address the nation’s budget crisis.
We do not believe that in this country freedom is reserved for the lucky, or happiness for the few. We recognize that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, any one of us at any time may face a job loss, or a sudden illness, or a home swept away in a terrible storm. The commitments we make to each other through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security, these things do not sap our initiative, they strengthen us. They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great, said President Obama, addressing the nation from the steps of the U.S. Capitol.
The president has steadfastly argued for a “balanced approach” that takes into account the sacrifices already made by middle class families and calls for the wealthiest individuals to pay their fair share. Congressional Republican leaders, on the other hand, have fought to preserve tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations while demanding deep cuts to education, medical care, public safety, medical research, environmental protection and other services upon which families, students, seniors, persons with disabilities and everyday Americans rely.
Making deep, across-the-board cuts to the nation’s primary social safety net programs would result in dire consequences.
Medicaid
- Provides medical care to 32 million children nationwide, approximately 15 percent of whom have special health care needs
- Is the single largest health insurer for poor children
- Is the primary source of medical care for persons with disabilities
Medicare
- Provides medical care to 50 million seniors 65 years of age and older, half of whom have annual incomes below $22,000
- One out every four Medicare beneficiaries has a mental disability
- Two million beneficiaries live in long-term care facilities
Social Security
- 1.27 million blind and disabled children receive benefits
- 3.4 million children and young adults 19 years of age and younger receive benefits
- 39.1 million individuals aged 65 or older receive benefits
- 12.4 million individuals with disabilities receive benefits


Posted February 25th, 2013 at 10:45 pm
I retired at age 71 with only 11.5 years in education. I was counting on my late husband’s survivor benefits. Suddenly, I got a letter from Social Security that my benefits would be cut by 2/3!!! It was a major shock. I feel very angry about the GPO and WEP laws. These laws are totally unfair. I am trying to get involved somehow in the hope that the law will be repealed for the sake of future generations.
Posted February 14th, 2013 at 1:58 pm
The more cuts made the more you see shit like abuse of disabled and elderly go up. Nobody is talking about that.
Posted January 29th, 2013 at 11:19 pm
I am one who is just about below poverty level….and add to that the fact that I am in one of the States that its local governments do not pay into Social Security, ( and because of that, the employees also don’t pay into SS.) The first time you hear of this — or heard of this in the past, was at the time you were being informed of the benefits of your new job. School teachers, police/ fire employees, are all affected by this … check out the socialsecurityfairnessact. I am in one of the states affected by both the GPO (Government Pension Offset), and the WEP (Windfall Elimination Provision). Thanks to Reagan, I am only allowed $113 per month. I am penalized on the money I already paid into SS. Some in the police department started there as the first big job they had. They have NO SS to look forward to. Any, I guess, is better than none….but you can’t get much less than $113, although I started out at $97 per mo. I went back to work at age 68, and got a $15 an hour raise from working in the private sector, but I do not get even the COLA on SS. I don’t know what I will do should my hubby die before me…he gets HIS full benefits from SS….if he goes before me, I will get none of his…and the reverse is true should I die first.
I have been fighting to get the two laws cited above repealed since around 2001, and President Obama said in 2008, that he would sign that bill into law if they could get it to his desk.
With this current Congress, I have ‘almost’ given up hope of that ever happening. I can’t even get my own Rep. or Senators to co-sponsor this bill….so my hopes are on a very thin wisp of a line these days.
Posted January 26th, 2013 at 1:54 pm
for the next four years I would like to see President Obama to repeal the GPO/WEP law, that law is very wrong because Social Security was promise to us and should not be taken away from us, Social Security is not the government money, that’s our money, we should be entitle to our full benefits, pleas get this law repeal soon.
Posted January 29th, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Angela, please check out the socialsecurityfairnessact on Facebook, and join them…its a very hard battle, but we can’t give up, even with this Congress who fight our President at every step. We need more and more people involved in this attempt to get what is rightfully ours!
REPEAL the GPO/WEP
Posted January 26th, 2013 at 12:17 pm
These individuals including our parents are living below the poverty level. Making cuts here would hurt those impacted the most by what the banks did to us. Most of the middle class joined their ranks. As a society, cuts here would be immoral.