Posted in: Kids Not Cuts, Moving in Congress

Cliff averted, but education funding still teeters on the edge

Tag , , ,

By Amanda Litvinov

The hard work of advocates for public education and middle class opportunity paid off when Congress passed the American Taxpayer Relief Act on Jan. 2, which established new revenues, protected the middle class from higher income tax rates and delayed across-the-board funding cuts that would have a crushing impact on public education.

Take Action ›

Use NEA’s Educator Connector Line to urge your representatives to protect education, Medicaid and Medicare. Call 866-293-7278 today!

But the key word in the previous sentence is “delayed.” The arbitrary across-the-board slash to the portion of the federal budget that includes education programs could still happen in 2013 if lawmakers can’t come to an agreement before March 2 on how to replace these unwise cuts. At a minimum, education could still be hit with a cut of more than $3 billion this year.

Round 1 was bitter, but it might end up looking like a pillow fight compared to the next round in the budget battle. Republican leaders have vowed they will not go any further to restore fairness to our tax system or close wasteful corporate tax loopholes. All further deficit reduction, they say, must come from spending cuts.

Voices calling for a balanced approach that preserves programs students and working families depend on will be even more crucial in the coming weeks because of new complicating factors that raise the stakes even higher for public education:

  • New factor #1: We’re going to hit the debt ceiling even sooner than expected. According to a new analysis by the Bipartisan Policy Center, the U.S. will no longer be able to pay all of its bills beginning sometime between Feb. 15 and March 1. (Remember that the 2011 showdown around this credit limit led to the unprecedented downgrading of the U.S. government’s credit rating.) Raising this limit was once routine—it was done 18 times under President Reagan and 7 times under President George W. Bush. But this time around, some Republicans have made it clear that they will agree to raise the debt ceiling only if they can take a hatchet to spending, which means public education, Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security could still be on the chopping block.
  • New factor #2: The 6-month Continuing Resolution that Congress and President Obama agreed on to temporarily fund the government expires in late March. To avoid another temporary “Band-Aid” measure and the anxiety-inducing threat of a government shutdown, Congress would have to pass all 12 appropriations bills that fund the government for the rest of the fiscal year.
  • New factor #3: States will set next year’s budgets uncertain of how much federal money they can count on. This could result in a flurry of pink slips issued to educators and other public employees in the early spring. And that would be terrible for students, terrible for educators and their families and terrible for the economy.

Arizona math teacher and NEA President Dennis Van Roekel said that while passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act was a step in the right direction, Congress cannot continue to “kick the can,” holding the fate of the middle class hostage to politics.

“Additional deep, arbitrary cuts to discretionary programs will be devastating to the programs and services that ordinary Americans depend on and inflict tremendous, irreversible harm on our nation’s 50 million students, particularly those with the greatest needs,” said Van Roekel.

“Across-the-board cuts will mean fewer educators in our schools, students crammed into already overcrowded classrooms, a shorter school week, 4-year-olds cheated out of early childhood education, and dreams dashed for aspiring college students.”

Lawmakers have a clear choice: Demand that the nation’s wealthiest pay their fair share and stop giving sweetheart deals to powerful corporations, or make the nation’s students and working families continue to bear the greatest burden of deficit reduction on their own.

Students are counting on you to contact your elected leaders as the budget battle goes on. Remind lawmakers that investing in our nation’s students is the surest path to rebuilding the middle class and a strong economy!

Related Articles

Educators urge peers to stick up for students in Washington budget fight

Educators urge peers to stick up for students in Washington budget fight

Public school educators fear bullies in Washington could hurt students in their schools. Read More

NEA President: Don't Forget Children in Debt Negotiations

NEA President: Don't Forget Children in Debt Negotiations

Negotiations on federal debt ceiling and deficit reduction stall in Washington Read More

Reader Comments
  • Junior
    Posted February 5th, 2013 at 11:13 am

    Why are we blaming just the “wealthy” for the downfall of education? We are approaching this the same way the other side of the fence is approaching the problem – point fingers and cast blame in order to get what we want. We are educators and role models, can we please act accordingly? Why is it that out of all the money our government spends – national defense, social programs, lobbyist functions, politician’s campaigns & benefits, etc – why is it that we choose to cut education first – EVERY TIME? Is it possible that we come together with Republicans and look at true spending and actually cut areas that are not as integral in our society as public education?

    Reply
  • Gerald Ludwig
    Posted January 26th, 2013 at 1:42 pm

    And why do they want to keep cutting public education and send the money to their voucher programs?

    Reply
  • mary ann harris
    Posted January 14th, 2013 at 8:27 pm

    I agree that education should NOT be cut in anyway. Tax the wealthy for the needed money for our government to work.

    Reply
    • Kathryn E GLASS
      Posted January 15th, 2013 at 9:24 pm

      Why does education always have to be the first to suffer when cuts are needed? Don’t the wealthy know how important education is to this country? They got to go to good schools when they were school age. Don’t they want the leaders of tomorrow (our child-
      ren) to have the same opportunity?

      Reply
  • Leave a Comment