Posted in: Election 2012, Moving in Congress
Obama’s judicial nominees face possible challenge from GOP Senators
Tag GOP, judicial nominations, President Barack Obama, Republicans, U.S. Senate
by Brian Washington/Official White House photo above by Pete Souza
The judiciary is playing an increasingly important role in the lives of hardworking Americans. That’s because legislation linked to the issues that matter to the middle class—like public education, health care, and the ability to have a voice in the workplace—are often debated in some of our nation’s highest courts.
Next week, lawmakers in the U.S. Senate could take action on as many as 17 out of 20 judicial nominations of the Obama Administration. If confirmed, these judges would fill court vacancies in communities across the country—including areas where seats on the bench have been vacant for more than 18 months. It’s an urgent priority for areas with particularly high numbers of case filings.
But GOP leaders are hoping to stall the process by denying the chamber the 60 votes necessary for each nominee to win confirmation. Senate Democrats have condemned the unprecedented obstruction.
The President’s nominees enjoy broad support from both Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee. In fact, the committee members approved 13 of the nominations unanimously. The group is also pretty diverse—with 9 women and 10 minorities, including candidates who are gay, Latino, African American, and Asian American.
Americans want a judiciary system that works fairly for everyone and not just a privileged few. The Obama Administration is fighting to make sure that all citizens have equal access to a fair hearing in court. If you are an educator and public education matters to you, then who is on the courts should also matter to you.
Sign up to get the latest information from Education Votes on the confirmation process for President Obama’s judicial nominees and how you can help move them forward in the Senate.
Education Votes Poll for April 16, 2011
Who do you think will win the GOP presidential nomination for 2012? Read More



Posted March 12th, 2012 at 9:51 pm
So many republican responses, with nothing to do with article. When teachers are inept to appropriately responding to an article. How can our kids be expected to fairly analyze and repond to a simple article, let alone run the country. Just too much darn hatred towards others that don’t quite have your color in them. Hidden racism.
The article has to do with whether judges are being kept from office by the republicans.
Posted March 12th, 2012 at 10:09 pm
I’m sorry. “When teachers are inept to appropriately responding to an article.”
That just isn’t a sentence, Mr. Von. Perhaps, you should lighten-up a little. Maybe, even buy some new crayons.
Posted March 12th, 2012 at 1:20 pm
Lorraine said “but I won’t surrender my vote to the path of Obama and his big government (socialist) agenda”.
Oh, so you’ll surrender your vote to a candiate like Rick Santorum who wants to legislate morality by banning abortions, gay marriage, taking away your contraception, etc…
How on EARTH can a fully functioning normal adult vote for the party (GOP) of overly invasive religious FANATICS who want TOTAL govt involvement in people’s private lives…
So much for the party of “less govt”…Republicans want to take this country back to the days of the Spanish Inquisition….
Obama 2012
Posted March 11th, 2012 at 1:42 pm
Cindy, Tara, David,
It’s so good to know that I am not alone. My colleagues are sooo anti Republican that they are blinded to what is actually happening to this country. Where will we educators be when we no longer have an America that is strong, functional and constitutionally based? Lost amid the chaos that reigns in Europe and the Middle East. I’m no fan of the current Republican field of candidates ( wish Ron Paul had more realistic foreign policy) but I won’t surrender my vote to the path of Obama and his big government (socialist) agenda.
Posted March 12th, 2012 at 9:32 pm
Lorraine,
Wouldn’t it be interesting to have an opinion poll for members to show which political party they are going to support in 2012? I believe many would be in total agreement with you (and, me). However, even though this site is paid for by our dues, I doubt a fair outcome would be expected since the NEA employees are so “one-minded” about pushing the president’s agenda down our throats. Even though his agenda has failed America in so many ways.
Your comment is excellent! But, gosh, where are the other 298,000 members’ voices? Oh yeah, they’ve been told they are loosing interest in the teaching profession and that the only way to improve that is the re-elect Obama. How sad is that? Isn’t that like the death blow for the boxer who is down for the final count.
Posted March 10th, 2012 at 11:13 pm
When you provide us with information about pending legislation or other actions by Congress and expect us to take action, it would be helpful if you published a link to a page created by NEA that identifies the NEA position and a listing of the members of Congress (Senate or House as appropriate) and identifies the best assessment of their positions. The list should include state, district number, position on bill (pro, con, undecided, unknown or other position), contact link to member’s web page or address for communications to each legislator. Note that most information would be consistent throughout a legislative session except position.
This would allow readers to know how to phrase communications and to point out those legislators who need special attention to lobby for their votes.
NEA members and supporters should forward responses from their legislators to NEA staff to update or follow-up on the positions posted on the respective NEA page for that legislation. Of special importance is to notify NEA members and readers of legislators who did not support the NEA position as those legislators could then face a voter backlash in their state/district immediately and during re-election campaigns.
I for one do not want to send a message to a legislator asking them to support the NEA position if they already support it. I could choose to thank them instead.
Posted March 12th, 2012 at 9:46 pm
John,
These are wonderful ideas, only I can’t figure-out how the NEA PAC has only found Democrats to talk to. Lets face it, if someone doesn’t talk to you and sides with an opposing party, why would you give support to that individual’s position and vice-versa? Wonder why we have political gridlock in Washington… thank our PAC. Go figure. I never thought my dues would go towards causing that dilemma. America is a mess because of it! If the current President can’t get the two teams to work together, then, it’s time for a change in leadership.
Posted March 18th, 2012 at 10:55 am
George, PAC dollars and dues dollars are separate things. Only a fraction of our members make voluntary donations to the NEA PAC– the arm of the NEA which impacts elections. If members do not like who the PAC supports, they do not donate.
NEA attempts to work with both D’s and R’s to craft sound educational policy– I have seen this done and been a part of it during efforts at reauthorizing ESEA a few months ago.
If you are referring to our PAC dollars supporting more D candidates than R candidates at the national level, then I would urge you to take a long, hard look at both parties’ adopted national platforms for education (http://www.p2012.org/issues/platformeduc.html). R’s want to create strong schools by supporting vouchers, eliminating bargaining, and the overall privatization of our public schools. D’s want to create strong schools by supporting decision-making WITH teachers, parental engagement in our public schools, and fully funding IDEA.
While RTTT has pushed some uncomfortable changes, those changes have always required working with teachers through their associations/unions. Most Republican presidential candidates (and Republican-led state governments around the nation) are pushing for an end to unions altogether. If you can read those “tea leaves”…
Until the national Republican party and national Republican candidates act more like the Republicans I work with and who live next door to me, I cannot see much reason in supporting their political careers.
Posted March 10th, 2012 at 9:30 pm
Obama’s international and educational policies are disastrous for our country. He has continued the war machine and will probably invade Iran and Syria costing America more than it can afford. He does not understand (or chooses to ignore) the obstacles facing innner city public schools. I am greatly disappointed with Obama and the Democractic party; I haven’t decided if I will even vote in the next election.
Posted March 12th, 2012 at 9:52 pm
Cindy, please intend to vote and get every person you know to vote against Obama.
Be strong girl… you have a Big Voice, and it counts!
Excellent comment… and do author more! People need to hear the truth and be encouraged to vote for the truth.
Posted March 10th, 2012 at 3:09 pm
Stop telling me how great this president is. He’s stood alongside Jeb Bush in Florida, Rahm Emmanuel is trying to mirror Jeb’s work in Chicago, he loves charter schools and testing… What a scary scary future this country will have if the over 90% of students in public schools are taught by for profit schools and corporate America and all the NEA does is just continue supporting the dems, supporting politics as usual regardless of where their goals will take us. He has no desire to get rid of Duncan… he’s in too deep. So is Rahm, Duncan, Rhee, his large donors like the Waltons… This teacher will be THROWING her vote to someone, and it sure as heck won’t be Obama. In fact… there will be a lot of teachers doing this exact same thing.
Posted March 10th, 2012 at 8:29 pm
Tara,
I am in complete agreement and have been articulating this same sentiment to my teaching colleagues.