<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Educators Fight Bill That Would “Cap” Future for New York Students</title>
	<atom:link href="http://educationvotes.nea.org/2011/05/31/educators-fight-bill-that-would-%e2%80%9ccap%e2%80%9d-future-for-new-york-students/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://educationvotes.nea.org/2011/05/31/educators-fight-bill-that-would-%e2%80%9ccap%e2%80%9d-future-for-new-york-students/</link>
	<description>Education Votes engages, recruits and informs activists in the fight for public education, higher education and strengthening the middle class.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Teri Gruenwald</title>
		<link>http://educationvotes.nea.org/2011/05/31/educators-fight-bill-that-would-%e2%80%9ccap%e2%80%9d-future-for-new-york-students/comment-page-1/#comment-12933</link>
		<dc:creator>Teri Gruenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.educationvotes.nea.org/?p=5440#comment-12933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In California, we have a ridiculous 67% majority threshold in order to raise revenue at the local and state level. My school district lost a parcel tax election last month because of 31 votes.  66.47% of the voters voted on a $180.00 a year parcel tax ($.50 a day for 4 years, mind you), but we were .23% away from the 67% threshold.  As a result, we will have 6 furlough days next year and our co-curricular stipends are slashed by 50%.  This is devastating to our school district and this same story plays itself out all the time in California.  This is definitely tyranny by the minority.  It only takes a simple majority to cut taxes but a super majority to pass a tax.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In California, we have a ridiculous 67% majority threshold in order to raise revenue at the local and state level. My school district lost a parcel tax election last month because of 31 votes.  66.47% of the voters voted on a $180.00 a year parcel tax ($.50 a day for 4 years, mind you), but we were .23% away from the 67% threshold.  As a result, we will have 6 furlough days next year and our co-curricular stipends are slashed by 50%.  This is devastating to our school district and this same story plays itself out all the time in California.  This is definitely tyranny by the minority.  It only takes a simple majority to cut taxes but a super majority to pass a tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Mortland</title>
		<link>http://educationvotes.nea.org/2011/05/31/educators-fight-bill-that-would-%e2%80%9ccap%e2%80%9d-future-for-new-york-students/comment-page-1/#comment-12923</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Mortland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.educationvotes.nea.org/?p=5440#comment-12923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Washington state, we had such a cap, but it was set high enough that proponents failed to restrict the growth as they had hoped.  We also had the 60% rule applied to local excess levies (authorizations to exceed the tax mill limitations) to raise money to support maintenance and operations budgets and to pass bond issues.  A few years back, we voted out the 60% rule on maintenance and operations levies and it now takes only a simple majority.  The 60% rule still applies to bond issues to raise money for building and remodeling schools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Washington state, we had such a cap, but it was set high enough that proponents failed to restrict the growth as they had hoped.  We also had the 60% rule applied to local excess levies (authorizations to exceed the tax mill limitations) to raise money to support maintenance and operations budgets and to pass bond issues.  A few years back, we voted out the 60% rule on maintenance and operations levies and it now takes only a simple majority.  The 60% rule still applies to bond issues to raise money for building and remodeling schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI contains query)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 383/492 objects using disk: basic

Served from: educationvotes.nea.org @ 2013-05-19 23:02:45 -->